Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-03-31 disposed

Ramu & another vs State of U.P

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The petitioners, convicted under Sections 148, 302 and 149 IPC in 2007 for a 2005 incident, sought bail pending appeal. The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court's bail rejection but, noting the appeal had been pending for a decade, directed the High Court to decide it within four months. The judgment addresses systemic delays in criminal appeals across Indian courts and emphasizes that Article 21 protects the right to speedy disposal of appeals. The Court initiated a pilot project to analyze and address long-pending criminal appeals in the Allahabad High Court, directing submission of detailed data on case pendency and remedial measures."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Right to Speedy Trial Constitutional Law Bail Judicial Efficiency Case Management Article 21

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login