Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-02-22 disposed

Kudrat Sandhu vs Union of India and Anr

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Multiple petitions challenged the tribunal appointment procedures under the 2017 Rules. The Court issued interim directions modifying the Search-cum-Selection Committee structure and appointment terms. On 22 February 2018, it addressed the status of 19 tribunals' selection processes. The Court held that tribunals where substantial selection steps had already occurred (CESTAT, DRT, DRAT, NCLAT, NCDRC members, AFT) should proceed unaffected. For tribunals with minimal progress, the interim directions would apply. The Court rejected suggestions for uniform 5-year terms and High Court judge conditions, instead maintaining existing statutory terms and service conditions."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Tribunal Governance Judicial Appointments Public Service Rules and Regulations

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login