Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-02-22 partly_allowed

Kudrat Sandhu vs Union of India and Anr

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Multiple writ petitions challenged the constitutional validity of the 2017 Rules governing tribunal member appointments. The Supreme Court passed interim directions modifying the selection process: Chairperson appointments will be made by Chief Justice of India nomination (not through Search Committees); tribunal members will serve 5-year terms (not 3 years) with conditions equivalent to High Court judges; and all selections shall be protected from the final judgment outcome. The Court, balancing constitutional concerns with procedural fairness, allowed tribunals already conducting substantive selection work to continue unhindered, while subjecting newly initiated processes to the revised interim framework.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Administrative Law Tribunal Appointments Judicial Procedure Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login