Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2026-05-04 remanded

Kumud Lall vs Suresh Chandra Roy (D) through LRS. and Ors

Bench: 2 — J.K. Maheshwari, Atul S. Chandurkar

In Brief

A woman lost vision in her eye after cataract surgery by Dr. P.B. Lall in 1990. Her husband filed a consumer complaint in 1997 alleging medical negligence. The District Forum awarded compensation, but the State Commission reversed this, exonerating the doctor. During the revision at the National Consumer Commission, the doctor died in 2009. The question arose whether his legal heirs could be sued. The Supreme Court held that a claim for medical negligence is personal to the doctor and does not survive his death if no liability was established before his death. However, claims for pecuniary loss to the complainant's estate (medical expenses, etc.) may survive against the doctor's estate. The Court remitted the matter for fresh adjudication.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Medical Negligence Consumer Protection Succession Law Tort Law Procedure on Death of Party Civil Procedure Abatement of Suits

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login