Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-05-09 dismissed

Lance Nayak PNO No.980510777 Raj Bahadur & Ors vs State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals challenging the High Court's dismissal of a writ petition regarding promotion to Sub-Inspector rank in Uttar Pradesh Police. The appellants, who had failed to secure minimum 50 marks in certain subjects despite achieving an overall aggregate score, contended that selection should be based on aggregate marks (paper-wise) rather than subject-wise. The Court held that the statutory requirement of obtaining minimum 50 marks in each subject is mandatory and cannot be circumvented by focusing on aggregate score. Selection must assess candidates subject-wise to comply with the U.P. Sub-Inspector and Inspector Service Rules, 2008. Merit, while important, cannot override mandatory statutory eligibility criteria established by the service rules."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Service Law Police Administration Promotion and Selection Examination Rules Reservation Policy Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login