Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-12-17 partly_allowed

Lanco Hills Technology Park Pvt. Ltd vs Manisha Balkrishna Kulkarni & Anr

Bench: 2 — 2

In Brief

A real estate developer appealed against an order by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission directing it to pay compensation for delayed delivery of a property. The developer argued it was exempt from paying compensation due to force majeure events that extended the delivery period. The Supreme Court held that while force majeure extends the contractual delivery deadline, it does not eliminate the developer's liability to pay compensation for delays falling within the agreed compensation framework. The developer remained liable to pay Rs 5 per sq ft for a six-month delay as specified in the agreement. The appeal was partly allowed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Consumer Protection Real Estate Law Delay in Delivery Compensation Force Majeure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login