Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-01-30 partly_allowed

Latesh @ Dadu Baburao Karlekar & Ors vs State of Maharashtra

Bench: 2 — N.V. Ramana

In Brief

Five persons were convicted by trial court and the High Court for murder and attempted murder in connection with a violent assault in Mumbai on 10 December 2006 where one person died and another was injured. The appellants challenged their convictions, raising concerns about delayed disclosure of accused names and procedural issues. The Supreme Court held that while the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt for three accused (Nos. 1, 5 and 6) based on eyewitness testimony, medical evidence and recovered weapons, the evidence against two accused (Nos. 2 and 3) was insufficient—resting solely on the injured witness's statement with no independent corroboration and no weapons recovered from them. The Court acquitted these two, allowing the appeals partly.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Evidence Eyewitness Testimony Unlawful Assembly Murder Beyond Reasonable Doubt Procedural Safeguards

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login