Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-07-13 dismissed

Laurel Energetics Pvt. Ltd vs Securities and Exchange Board of India

Bench: 3 — R.F. Nariman

In Brief

Laurel Energetics acquired shares in Rattan India Infrastructure Ltd., a company demerged from Indiabulls Real Estate Ltd., at Rs. 6.30 per share in 2014. When Laurel later made a public open offer at Rs. 3.20 per share, SEBI determined that the 2014 acquisitions did not qualify for exemption under Regulation 10 of the SEBI Takeover Regulations 2011, requiring the higher price. Laurel argued the exemption should apply because the promoters had been identical since IBREL's inception. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that Regulation 10 exempts transfers only among persons named as promoters in the shareholding pattern of the target company itself for three years prior. The three-year period runs from the target company's listing date (July 2012), not from the original company's inception, and plain statutory language cannot be overridden by reference to legislative purpose when the words are unambiguous.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Securities Law Takeover Regulation SEBI Promoter Exemption Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login