Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-07-13 dismissed

Laurel Energetics Pvt. Ltd vs Securities and Exchange Board of India

Bench: 2 — R.F. Nariman

In Brief

This appeal challenged SEBI's order requiring a higher price for shares acquired during a promoter transaction. After a demerger, the appellant acquired shares in the target company (Rattan India) at Rs.6.30 per share in 2014. When later announcing a public offer at Rs.3.20 per share, SEBI rejected an exemption claim under Regulation 10 for promoter transfers because the three-year promoter requirement had not been met—time was measured from the target company's listing date in 2012, not from the predecessor's incorporation. The Court held that Regulation 10 applies to the separately listed target company only, not its predecessor, and that the corporate veil cannot be lifted by courts without express statutory authorization. The appeal was dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Securities Regulation Takeover Law Statutory Interpretation Promoter Exemptions Demerger Corporate Veil Regulatory Compliance

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login