Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-05-24 allowed

M.C. Mehta vs Union of India & Ors

Bench: 2 — Madan B. Lokur

In Brief

This case examined whether the Ministry of Housing curtailed statutory public consultation periods for Delhi's Master Plan amendments. The government reduced objection-submission time from 90 days to 3 days, citing public order and exigency. Despite receiving 741 objections, the Court found no genuine justification for this drastic curtailment. Rejecting the government's request to modify its 15-May order, the Court held that meaningful public participation is essential in urban planning. The Court required at least 15 days for objections and their substantive consideration before final notification, prioritizing Delhi's residents and future generations over administrative convenience."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Urban Development Administrative Law Procedural Fairness Statutory Interpretation Public Participation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login