Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-20 dismissed

M. Dakshayani vs State of Karnataka & Anr

Bench: 2 — L. Nageswara Rao

In Brief

The appellant, an Ophthalmology lecturer, challenged her junior colleague's promotions to Assistant and Full Professor. The Karnataka Administrative Tribunal found the promotions invalid because the respondent had lacked a Post-Graduate degree during her initial years as a lecturer. The High Court reversed this, allowing the promotions. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court, holding that qualification rules for Assistant Professor promotion require three years of teaching experience and Post-Graduation qualification, without mandating that the experience come after degree completion. The Court also dismissed a contempt petition, finding no willful violation when the respondent was temporarily appointed department head during the appeal.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Service Law Recruitment and Promotion Administrative Law Qualification for Promotion Teaching Experience

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login