Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-12-19 partly_allowed

M.K. Ranjitsinh & Ors vs Union of India & Ors

Bench: 2 — Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Atul S. Chandurkar

In Brief

The Supreme Court affirmed the right to a healthy environment as fundamental under Article 21 and upheld the constitutional obligation to protect the critically endangered Great Indian Bustard (GIB). Rather than impose a blanket ban on transmission lines, the Court adopted an expert committee's evidence-based approach balancing biodiversity protection with renewable energy development. It expanded Corporate Social Responsibility to explicitly include environmental stewardship. Key directives: redesignated priority conservation areas in Rajasthan (14,013 sq. km) and Gujarat (740 sq. km); prohibited new overhead transmission lines and renewable projects exceeding 2 MW in priority zones; mandated strategic undergrounding, rerouting, and habitat restoration measures to be completed within two years. The decision reaffirmed that conservation must be proportionate, scientifically informed, and aligned with India's climate commitments.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Wildlife Protection Environmental Law Conservation Biology Constitutional Law Corporate Social Responsibility Infrastructure Development Renewable Energy Power Transmission Administrative Law Endangered Species Judicial Review Expert Committees

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login