Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-08-11 allowed

M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-III

Bench: 2 — Rohinton Fali Nariman, B.R. Gavai

In Brief

A company claimed a deduction under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act for interest on loans by issuing debentures to financial institutions in lieu of outstanding interest, under an agreed rehabilitation plan. The Revenue disallowed the deduction, relying on Explanation 3C (inserted retrospectively in 2006), which provides that interest converted into a loan is not deemed actually paid. The Supreme Court held that where debentures are accepted by lenders in actual discharge of the liability (not as conversion of unpaid interest into a fresh loan), the deduction is allowable. Explanation 3C is clarificatory—plugging the loophole of misuse—and does not apply to bona fide transactions of actual payment by alternative modes. The Court distinguished the case from prior precedent and restored the appellate tribunal's decision.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Law Section 43B Deductions Actual Payment Debentures Interest on Loans Statutory Interpretation Retrospective Legislation Rehabilitation Plans

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login