Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-10-26 allowed

M. Ravindran vs The Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence

Bench: 3 — Uday Umesh Lalit, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Vineet Saran

In Brief

The Supreme Court clarified the scope of the indefeasible right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC. An accused is deemed to have exercised this right once he files a bail application and offers to abide by bail conditions—not when he is actually released. Filing of a chargesheet or additional complaint after a bail application is filed does not extinguish this right if the application was made within the statutory period for investigation completion. However, if the accused fails to apply for bail when the right accrues, and prosecution subsequently files a chargesheet, the right is lost. The Court held that the right to default bail is an integral part of Article 21 (personal liberty) protections and must be enforced promptly to prevent prosecutorial abuse.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Bail Default Bail Personal Liberty Constitutional Law Criminal Justice Investigation Detention

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login