Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-02-11 dismissed

M/s Daddy’s Builders Pvt. Ltd. & Another vs Manisha Bhargava and Another

Bench: 2 — Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, M.R. Shah

In Brief

The petitioners, Daddy's Builders Pvt. Ltd., sought special leave to appeal a decision rejecting their application for condonation of delay in filing a written statement in a consumer complaint. The written statement was filed beyond the 45-day period prescribed under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court held that consumer forums—District, State, or National Commissions—have no power to accept written statements beyond 45 days. Although the Constitution Bench decision establishing this rule applies prospectively, orders condoning delay before that judgment remain valid. The Court dismissed the petition, confirming that condonation is discretionary and case-specific, not mandatory.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Consumer Protection Civil Procedure Condonation of Delay Pleading and Evidence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login