Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-08-01 dismissed

MADHUSUDAN BHANUPRASAD PANDYA vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Bench: 2 — Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Indira Banerjee

In Brief

The appellant claimed exemption under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 for excess land declared vacant by the competent authority. The State took possession on 24 July 1990, and the land was vested. The appellant challenged the rejection of his exemption application, arguing possession could not be taken over due to a civil court's status quo order from the previous day. The Supreme Court held that since possession was validly taken before the Act's repeal (31 March 1999) and no proper challenge to vesting was placed in issue, no relief could be granted. The appeal was dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Urban Land Ceiling Land Acquisition Constitutional Law Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login