Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-08-29 partly_allowed

Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs Manoj Kumar & Anr

Bench: 2 — A.K. Sikri

In Brief

The Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation introduced a Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) for its employees to manage its eventual closure. The VRS allowed employees to opt for voluntary retirement, but with a strict stipulation that offers could not be withdrawn once made. Several employees submitted VRS applications, then sought to withdraw them after the Scheme's closing date (August 1, 2005), but their withdrawals were refused and their applications were accepted. The Supreme Court held that while employees can generally withdraw VRS applications before employer acceptance, such withdrawal must occur during the validity period of the Scheme itself. Once the Scheme closes, withdrawal is no longer permissible, even if the application remains unaccepted. The Court distinguished between two separate Scheme periods and allowed only those who withdrew during their respective valid periods to claim reinstatement.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Voluntary Retirement Scheme Employment Law Contract Law Public Sector Undertakings Administrative Law Constitutional Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login