Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-09-30 allowed

A. Satyanarayana Reddy and Others vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court and others

Bench: 3 — Dipak Misra

In Brief

Employees of a government-undertaking sugar factory were offered a Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) that did not include lay-off compensation. After accepting the VRS and receiving the special compensation package, the employees sought to claim lay-off compensation before the Labour Court. The High Court held they were no longer 'workmen' and thus lacked standing. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that although accepting a VRS ends the employment relationship, if the VRS does not expressly cover past dues like lay-off compensation, employees retain the right to claim such amounts under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The Court remitted the matter to the Labour Court for adjudication on merits.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Industrial Law Labour & Employment Law Voluntary Retirement Scheme Lay-off Compensation Labour Court Jurisdiction Workman - Definition and Rights Constitutional Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login