Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-01-31 dismissed

MAHADEV P KAMBEKAR(D) TR.LRS vs SHREE KRISHNA WOOLEN MILLS PVT. LTD

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre, Dinesh Maheshwari

In Brief

A property dispute arose between a lessor and lessee concerning a lease deed dated 1958. The lessee (plaintiff) sought specific performance of the lease, while the lessor filed a counter-claim seeking eviction and arrears of rent. The trial court decreed both claims. The High Court set aside the counter-claim as not maintainable, holding that suits between landlord and tenant for recovery of possession must be pursued in the Court of Small Causes under Section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882. The Supreme Court affirmed this decision, holding that such counter-claims cannot be entertained in higher civil courts and the distinction between licensor-licensee and landlord-tenant disputes is immaterial for jurisdiction purposes.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Property Law Lease Jurisdiction Small Cause Courts Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login