Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-01-31 dismissed

Mahadev P Kambekar (D) Tr. Lrs vs Shree Krishna Woolen Mills Pvt. Ltd

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

A lessor served a quit notice and counterclaimed for possession and arrears of rent against his lessee in a City Civil Court suit where the lessee sought specific performance of the lease deed. The High Court dismissed the lessor's counterclaim as not maintainable, holding that disputes between landlord and tenant concerning recovery of possession fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Small Causes under Section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882. The Supreme Court affirmed this, holding that the jurisdictional bar applies regardless of whether the suit involves collateral claims like specific performance, and whether the tenancy has been terminated.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Landlord and Tenant Civil Procedure Jurisdiction Counterclaim Lease Deed Specific Performance

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login