Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Friday, 30 October 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-06-03 allowed

MAHENDRA SINGH AND ORS vs STATE OF M.P

Bench: 2 — B.R. Gavai, Hima Kohli

In Brief

Mahendra Singh and three others were convicted by a trial court and the conviction upheld by the High Court for murder (Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC) and unlawful assembly (Section 148 IPC), based primarily on the eye-witness testimony of Amol Singh, the brother of the deceased. The Supreme Court found that Amol Singh was wholly unreliable because evidence from the accused's own witnesses proved he could not have witnessed the incident—he had learned of the death from others at the scene. The Court held that conviction cannot rest on wholly unreliable witness testimony, and medical evidence alone cannot substitute for credible eye-witness proof of guilt. The Court also emphasized that establishing motive does not sustain conviction. The appeals were allowed and all accused were acquitted and set at liberty."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Evidence Witness Credibility Homicide

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login