Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-05-03 allowed

Mamta Sahu vs Jayendra Sahu

Bench: 2 — Kurian

In Brief

Mamta Sahu sought transfer of family court proceedings from Pune, Maharashtra to Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Order 41 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013. She submitted that travel to Pune would be difficult as she has a three-year-old daughter. The Supreme Court found the circumstances warrant transfer and approved the petition, directing the family court case to be shifted to Bilaspur, holding that genuine hardship in attending court proceedings is a valid ground for transfer.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Transfer of Cases Family Law Jurisdiction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login