Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-09-13 partly_allowed

Manoj Kumar Etc. Etc vs State of Haryana and Others Etc. Etc

Bench: 2 — Arun Mishra

In Brief

The Supreme Court examined competing appeals regarding compensation for the acquisition of 354.50 acres in Haryana for urban development. The High Court had awarded Rs. 1,46,09,000 per acre by mechanically applying a 15% annual cumulative increase to a prior case (Swaran Singh). The Court held that previous awards cannot be blindly followed; they are merely evidence requiring proof of similarity. The Court set aside the High Court's determination, holding that compensation must be assessed on the case's specific facts and evidence. It reduced the award to Rs. 95 lakhs per acre, incorporating appropriate deductions for development costs and recognizing that land acquisition cases depend on their individual circumstances, not mechanical precedent.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Law Compensation Determination Precedent and Evidence Administrative Law Property Valuation Judicial Methodology Development Costs and Deductions

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login