Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-09-13 partly_allowed

Manoj Kumar Etc. Etc vs State of Haryana and Others Etc. Etc

Bench: 2 — Arun Mishra

In Brief

The Supreme Court considered consolidated appeals by the State of Haryana and landowners regarding land acquisition compensation for development of Jagadhari sectors. The High Court had determined compensation at Rs. 3,610 per square meter by mechanically following an earlier judgment without proper analysis. The Court held that compensation cannot be determined by blindly following previous awards; each case must be examined on its own facts, evidence, and comparable sales. The Court emphasized that development deductions must be properly applied and that foreign decisions are merely pieces of evidence, not binding precedent. The Court reduced compensation to Rs. 95 lakhs per acre, partly allowing the State's appeals and dismissing the landowners' appeals.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Compensation Determination Evidence Comparable Sales Development Deductions Appellate Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login