Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-02-07 dismissed

MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. (EARLIER KNOWN AS MARUTI UDYOG LTD.) vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan, Navin Sinha

In Brief

Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. (then Maruti Udyog Ltd.) challenged the High Court's dismissal of its income tax appeals concerning assessment years 1999–2000 and 2000–2001. The assessee claimed deductions under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act for: (1) Rs.69,93,00,428 in unutilised MODVAT (Modified Value Added Tax) credit on Excise Duty, and (2) Rs.3,08,99,171 in Sales Tax Recoverable. The Supreme Court held that unutilised MODVAT credit does not qualify for deduction under Section 43B because it is not a sum 'payable by the assessee'—the statutory liability to pay Excise Duty rests on the manufacturer of raw materials, not the purchaser. Although the purchaser receives a credit facility, this is not actual payment of a tax owed by the purchaser. The proviso to Section 43B did not apply because the liability to pay Excise Duty on finished vehicles arose only in the subsequent financial year. Both appeals were dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Law Tax Deductions Excise Duty MODVAT Credit Section 43B Sales Tax Statutory Liability

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login