Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-02-07 dismissed

MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. (EARLIER KNOWN AS MARUTI UDYOG LTD.) vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan, Navin Sinha

In Brief

Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. claimed a deduction under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act for Rs. 69.93 crores of unutilised MODVAT (Modular Value Added Tax) credit on excise duty as of March 31, 1999. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the claim, holding that unutilised MODVAT credit does not qualify as 'sum actually paid by the assessee by way of duty' under Section 43B. Although the assessee paid excise duty on raw materials purchased from suppliers, the legal liability to pay excise duty rested with those manufacturers, not the assessee. MODVAT credit is merely a facility to adjust future excise duty liability, not a payment made by the assessee itself.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Excise Duty MODVAT Credit Tax Deductions Central Excise Act

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login