Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-02-04 dismissed

MD. ALI IMAM & ORS.ETC.ETC vs THE STATE OF BIHAR THR. ITS CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS

Bench: 2 — Sanjay Kishan Kaul, K.M. Joseph

In Brief

Retired employees of minority colleges affiliated to Bihar universities challenged the State's refusal to extend Triple Benefit Scheme (pension, gratuity, and provident fund) benefits to those who retired before 31 August 2010, while granting them to those retiring after that date. The High Court dismissed their claim. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, holding that the Government had no obligation to extend benefits to employees of affiliated (non-constituent) colleges. When such benefits are voluntarily extended as educational support, the State may reasonably fix a cut-off date based on financial and administrative considerations. Unless shown to be capricious, the cut-off date is not discriminatory.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Administrative Law Employment Law Service Benefits Discrimination

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login