Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-03-29 disposed

Mekha Ram and Others etc. etc vs State of Rajasthan and Others etc. etc

Bench: 2 — M.R. Shah

In Brief

In-service nursing course trainees who were paid excess amounts based on a Single Judge's order (which allowed them deputation benefits) challenged the Division Bench's reversal and the State's right to recover those amounts. The Supreme Court held that restitution principles under Section 144 CPC apply to recover amounts paid pursuant to reversed court orders, regardless of whether employees belong to Class III/IV service. The Rafiq Masih principle limiting recovery only applies to amounts paid by mistake, not to those paid under subsequently reversed orders. The Court upheld recovery but refined the Division Bench's order by mandating recovery in thirty-six equal monthly installments, commencing April 2022, recognizing employees' financial capacity.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Civil Procedure Restitution Government Employee Benefits Service Rules Recovery of Amount

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login