Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-10-08 allowed

Miss ‘A’ vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

This appeal concerns the disclosure of statements recorded under Section 164 CrPC in a case involving allegations of abduction and sexual harassment. The Supreme Court held that while parties may ordinarily obtain copies of such statements upon payment of costs, cases involving sexual exploitation require strict confidentiality to protect victims. The Court disapproved the High Court's approach, emphasizing that its confidentiality directions must be followed in sensitive sexual exploitation matters. Statements can be furnished only after the Court takes cognizance and passes appropriate orders protecting victim interests.",

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Sexual Exploitation Criminal Procedure Confidentiality Victim Protection Evidence Law Abduction Sexual Harassment Miscellaneous Application

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login