In Brief
A young woman alleging sexual exploitation by an ashram head filed complaints with police, leading to FIRs and a special investigation. Her statement was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. The accused sought a certified copy, which was initially denied but the High Court ordered its release. The Supreme Court allowed the victim's appeal, holding that copies of statements recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. cannot be furnished to the accused until after the court takes cognizance. The Court emphasized that utmost confidentiality must be maintained in sexual exploitation cases to protect victims and witnesses from harm and interference.",
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.