Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-11-10 allowed

MITC ROLLING MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR vs M/S. RENUKA REALTORS AND ORS

Bench: 2 — Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta

In Brief

MITC Rolling Mills sought recovery of ₹2.52 crores for supply of TMT steel bars. The respondents obtained rejection of the plaint for non-compliance with mandatory pre-institution mediation under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The High Court dismissed the appeal as non-maintainable, holding that rejection of a plaint is not appealable under Section 13(1A). The Supreme Court reversed this, holding that rejection of a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC is a decree under Section 2(2) CPC and is therefore appealable under Section 13(1A). The proviso restricting appeals applies only to interlocutory orders, not decrees. The matter was remanded to the High Court for decision on merits.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Commercial Courts Act Appellate Jurisdiction Plaint Rejection Decree vs Interlocutory Order

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login