Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-03-26 dismissed

MODERN TRANSPORTN.CONSULTN.SER.P.LD. AND ANR vs C.P.F. COMMR. THR. COMMR. E.P.F. ORGANISATION AND ORS

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre, Dinesh Maheshwari

In Brief

The Supreme Court upheld that retired Railway employees who withdrew their provident fund accumulations cannot be treated as 'excluded employees' under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952. To qualify as an excluded employee, a person must have been a member of the Fund created under the 1952 Scheme and withdrawn their full accumulations from that specific Fund. Since Railway employees were members of the General Provident Fund, not the EPF Scheme, their prior withdrawals do not exempt them. When re-employed, they must join the EPF Scheme unless their employer obtains a valid exemption under Section 17 of the Act based on equivalent benefits.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Employees' Provident Fund Labour Law Social Security Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login