Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-26 allowed

D.T.C vs BALWAN SINGH

Bench: 2 — Sanjay Kishan Kaul, K.M. Joseph

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that periods of unauthorised absence without leave salary cannot be counted as qualifying service for pension. Under Rule 21 of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, only leave periods for which salary was paid count towards pension qualification. The Court rejected arguments that administrative instructions and Government decisions could supersede the clear statutory language. Although respondents had completed 10 years of service under the VRS, they failed to qualify for pension because excluded periods involved no salary payment. The Court allowed the appeal while protecting respondents from refund of any interim payments already received.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Service Pension Voluntary Retirement Scheme Qualifying Service Leave Entitlements Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login