Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-05-19 partly_allowed

Mohammad Azam Khan vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Mohammad Azam Khan, a politician facing 87 criminal cases, sought interim bail in a case (FIR No. 70 of 2020) where he was added as an accused after 1 year 7 months—coinciding with pending bail applications in another case. Having secured bail in 86 of 87 cases, he argued the late implication was political vendetta to prevent his release. The Supreme Court, exercising Article 142 jurisdiction, granted interim bail, noting the peculiar pattern and delay suggested an attempt to circumvent anticipated bail relief. The Court emphasized bail is a right, not exception, and courts should not conduct detailed merit inquiries. Interim bail continues until regular bail is decided, plus two weeks if denied.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Bail Constitutional Law Political Vendetta Right to Personal Liberty

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login