Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-02-05 allowed

MOHAMMADE YUSUF vs RAJKUMAR

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan, M.R. Shah

In Brief

A compromise decree passed in 1985 regarding a 7-biswa land was challenged as inadmissible in evidence on grounds of non-registration. The Supreme Court held that compromise decrees concerning property that is the subject-matter of the suit do not require registration under the Registration Act, 1908. Section 17(2)(vi) exempts "any decree or order of a Court" from registration, with an exception only for decrees covering property outside the suit's subject-matter. Since the compromise decree dealt with the suit property itself, it fell within the exemption and did not require registration. The Court set aside the trial court and High Court orders and directed the decree to be exhibited in evidence.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Registration Property Law Compromise Decree Evidence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login