Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-12-14 allowed

MOHAMMED ABDUL WAHID vs NILOFER & ANR

Bench: 2 — B. R. Gavai, Sanjay Karol

In Brief

The Supreme Court resolved conflicting High Court judgments on whether a party to a civil suit is a witness under the Code of Civil Procedure and Evidence Act. The Court held that a party entering the witness box is a witness with no distinction from other witnesses. Consequently, documents can be produced during cross-examination of both parties and witnesses for the purposes of cross-examination or refreshing memory, without prior advance production, provided such production relates to the pleaded issues. The Court emphasized that substance of pleadings matters more than form; if parties knew the case and tried issues, deficiencies in pleading cannot be raised later. The judgment set aside the High Court's decision and restored the original petition for decision on merits.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Evidence Civil Procedure Witness Examination Cross-Examination Document Production Pleadings

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login