Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-05-07 allowed

Mohd. Akhtar vs State of Jammu and Kashmir

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

In this case, the Supreme Court transferred a trial involving the abduction, rape, and murder of an eight-year-old girl from Kathua to Pathankot, Punjab. Local Bar Association obstruction and community tensions had created an atmosphere making fair trial impossible. The Court held that 'fair trial' is sacrosanct under Article 21 and must benefit both accused and victims equally. Fear and fair trial cannot coexist. The Court balanced accused rights against victim and witness safety, directing case transfer, in-camera proceedings, day-to-day sittings, continuous witness examination, and special protection for the juvenile accused and witnesses to ensure justice free from local intimidation."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Fair Trial Witness Protection Case Transfer Sexual Offences Crimes Against Children Judicial Administration

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login