Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-05-07 partly_allowed

Mohd. Akhtar vs State of Jammu and Kashmir

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

In this landmark judgment on the abduction, rape, and murder of an eight-year-old girl in Kathua, the Supreme Court transferred the case from Kathua district court to Pathankot in Punjab due to local bar association obstruction and threats to fair trial. The Court held that fair trial—a sacred constitutional principle under Article 21—must protect both accused persons and victims/witnesses, requiring them to participate free from fear and phobia. The Court directed personal presiding by the District Sessions Judge, day-to-day trial, in-camera proceedings, continuous witness examination without adjournments, and special protection for the juvenile accused. It also mandated translation of witness statements to English and provision of transportation and facilities to all participants.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Transfer of Cases Fair Trial Child Protection Juvenile Justice Witness Protection Public Safety Constitutional Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login