In Brief
This case examines police harassment and abuse of authority against petitioners who filed complaints of brutality. The Supreme Court confirmed, via judicial inquiry, that police visited the petitioners' home on December 20, 2011 to coerce them into withdrawing cases against erring officers. Although the petitioners exaggerated some details, the core finding was that police threatened, slapped, and unlawfully detained them, forcing a signed apology. The Court quashed the retaliatory FIR and charge-sheet filed against the petitioners under Sections 324/332/353/504 IPC, finding their defensive use of pepper spray was justified self-defence under the circumstances. The judgment criticized inadequate police discipline and directed enhanced protection for the petitioners, emphasizing urgent need for police reform and human rights training.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.