Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-01-23 disposed

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai vs Pankaj Arora (Secretary) and Others

Bench: 2 — N.V. Ramana

In Brief

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai sought to prosecute building occupants for structural violations. After the Metropolitan Magistrate refused to take cognizance, the Corporation appealed but the High Court dismissed it for lack of jurisdiction under Section 378 CrPC, though granted liberty to file a writ petition. The High Court then dismissed the subsequent writ petition, treating earlier observations as final. The Supreme Court held that observations made by a court lacking jurisdiction cannot acquire finality or serve as res judicata. The Court set aside the dismissal and remitted the writ petition for substantive hearing on merits, clarifying that only the jurisdictional finding (not the merits observations) in the earlier order was binding.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Criminal Procedure Jurisdiction Res Judicata Writ Petition Municipal Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login