Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-03-09 remanded

Rufina D'souza & Ors vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Ors

Bench: 3 — A.M. Khanwilkar

In Brief

Residents of a Mumbai building (J.D. House) filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the Municipal Corporation's notices declaring it a C-1 Category building and disconnecting utilities. The High Court summarily dismissed the petition, citing pending civil suits between private parties. The Supreme Court set aside this dismissal, holding that a writ court must examine substantive grounds for challenging administrative action by statutory authorities, even when civil disputes are pending between other parties. The pendency of private civil proceedings cannot be a valid reason to decline judicial review. The case was remanded for a fresh de novo hearing by the High Court.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Writ Jurisdiction Judicial Review Administrative Law Municipal Corporations Article 226 Certiorari

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login