Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-08-09 allowed

N.A.L. Layout Residents Association : P.M. Anupkumar vs Bangalore Development Authority & Ors

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan

In Brief

The Bangalore Development Authority had acquired land including Survey No. 50 for developing a housing layout. Land owners challenged the acquisition in several writ petitions, all dismissed. In 1984, the State took possession and handed the land to BDA. In 2001, the State withdrew the acquisition by notification, but then cancelled that withdrawal. Land owners challenged the cancellation, arguing possession was never properly taken. The High Court allowed their petition. The Supreme Court reversed this, holding that: (1) possession was validly taken in 1984 as evidenced by an official gazette notification; (2) earlier court findings on possession operate as res judicata; (3) the State can rescind a Section 48 withdrawal notification under the General Clauses Act; and (4) land owners cannot approach the government for relief after courts have dismissed identical writ petitions.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Land Law Administrative Law Notification and Rescission Doctrine of Res Judicata

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login