Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-08-09 allowed

N.A.L. Layout Residents Association : P.M. Anupkumar vs Bangalore Development Authority & Ors

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan

In Brief

This case concerns the validity of a State Government's withdrawal notification for acquired land (Survey No. 50). Land was acquired in 1977–1978 for the Bangalore Development Authority's BTM layout scheme. Despite earlier writ petitions by land owners seeking withdrawal being dismissed, they approached the Government in 2001, which issued a withdrawal notification. The Government later cancelled this after realizing possession had been taken in 1984. The High Court quashed the cancellation, but the Supreme Court reversed this, holding that once possession was validly taken and handed over to BDA, withdrawal could not occur. Earlier High Court findings on possession operate as res judicata and cannot be reopened. The Court allowed the Government's appeals and dismissed the writ petition.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Land Law Administrative Law Constitutional Law Res Judicata Estoppel

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login