Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Saturday, 07 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-09-11 allowed

Narendra & Ors vs State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors

Bench: 2 — A.K. Sikri

In Brief

Land acquired by the Ghaziabad Development Authority from multiple farmers in the same village under the same notification. The High Court awarded compensation to some farmers at Rs.297 per square yard but limited the appellants' compensation to Rs.115 per square yard (the rate they had claimed), arguing court fees had been paid accordingly. The Supreme Court held that after the 1984 amendment to the Land Acquisition Act, courts must award just and fair compensation based on true market value, irrespective of the amount claimed. Since the appellants' land was acquired under the same notification as similarly-situated farmers who received Rs.297 per square yard, they too were entitled to the same rate. Technical grounds like court fee amounts cannot deny fair compensation. The Court allowed the appeal and directed payment of the compensation differential, directing the appellants to pay the deficiency in court fees."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Compensation Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login