Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-07-03 allowed

Nithya Anand Raghavan vs State of NCT of Delhi and Ors

Bench: 3 — A.M. Khanwilkar

In Brief

A mother removed her seven-year-old daughter from the UK to India, claiming domestic violence. The child's father obtained a UK court wardship order directing the mother to return the child. He then filed a habeas corpus petition in India's High Court, which ordered return. The Supreme Court allowed the mother's appeal, holding that the child's best interests—not comity of courts—must be paramount. The child was born and remained an Indian citizen, had spent equal time in both countries, was settled in India with extended family, suffered from cardiac issues requiring maternal care, and would face harm if separated from her mother. The Court set aside the High Court's order and dismissed the habeas corpus petition, allowing the mother to retain custody while directing the father's participation in UK proceedings and visitation rights.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Family Law Child Custody International Child Abduction Habeas Corpus Parens Patriae Jurisdiction Comity of Courts Best Interests of Child Domestic Violence Hague Convention Writ Jurisdiction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login