Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-07-09 partly_allowed

Nitin Balkisan Gaikwad vs State of Maharashtra

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The appellant was convicted of murdering his wife under the Indian Penal Code and initially sentenced to death by the trial court. The High Court commuted this to life imprisonment, noting the case did not warrant capital punishment. However, it imposed a condition requiring the appellant to serve a minimum of 30 years without remission. The Supreme Court found that the High Court erred in imposing this minimum period condition. Recognizing extenuating circumstances—specifically, the appellant's attempted suicide with self-inflicted injuries immediately after the crime—the Court deleted the minimum period restriction and converted the sentence to simple life imprisonment, allowing for eventual remission eligibility."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Sentencing Capital Punishment Life Imprisonment Extenuating Circumstances

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login