Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-05 allowed

Nonihal Singh vs Maya Devi

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan

In Brief

A tenant in a rent control dispute challenged the High Court's rejection of his applications for extension of time and condonation of delay in depositing arrears of rent and mesne profits. Although the tenant missed the High Court's initial deadline (31.12.2017), he had subsequently deposited Rs.96,997/- in execution proceedings (accepted by the landlady) and a further Rs.33,000/- directly to the landlady. The Supreme Court found the High Court's dismissal orders were passed without considering these material facts and without noting that the High Court's own 2017 order had superseded the original tribunal decrees. The Court allowed the appeals, set aside the High Court's orders, and directed the tenant be restored to possession, allowing him to continue paying monthly rent as per the High Court's terms.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Landlord and Tenant Rent Control Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Execution of Decrees

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login