Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-02-27 allowed

P. Ayyanar Pothi vs Supriya Ayyanar Pothi

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

In this appeal, the husband challenged the Bombay High Court's decision to entertain his wife's application to transfer their divorce proceedings from a Tamil Nadu subordinate court to Maharashtra. The Supreme Court held that the power to transfer cases between states or between different High Court jurisdictions is exclusively vested in the Supreme Court under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, not in individual High Courts. The Bombay High Court therefore lacked jurisdiction to entertain the transfer petition. The Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's order.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Jurisdiction Transfer of Proceedings Family Law Divorce

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login