Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-12-13 allowed

P.C. MODI vs THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU VISHWA

Bench: 2 — Hima Kohli, Rajesh Bindal

In Brief

P.C. Modi, a Physical Training Instructor (PTI) at Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, was retired at age 60 instead of the 62-year retirement age available to teachers. Modi claimed he fell within the definition of "teacher" and should retire at 62. The High Court ruled against him. The Supreme Court allowed his appeal, holding that the definition of "teacher" in the Act is expansive and inclusive, covering anyone appointed to impart instructions, including physical education instructors. The Court directed payment of all consequential benefits and arrears as if Modi had continued working until age 62.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Service Law Educational Institutions Retirement Age Definition of Teacher Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login