Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-09-27 allowed

Padmini Singha vs State of Assam & Others

Bench: 3 — Dipak Misra

In Brief

A No-Confidence resolution against the President of Masughat Gaon Panchayat was challenged on procedural grounds because it was convened and presided over by the Block Development Officer instead of the Deputy Commissioner as mandated by Section 15 of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994. The High Court and Division Bench annulled the resolution. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that although Section 15 contains a mandatory procedural requirement, the affected party waived this condition by knowingly participating in the meeting and voting. The resolution was upheld as valid, applying the principle that procedural requirements benefiting a specific person can be waived when that person participates and no public interest is harmed."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Panchayat Raj Statutory Construction Procedural Compliance Waiver No-Confidence Motions

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login